© Pipa100 | Dreamstime.com
For years, the mammogram has served as the primary tool for breast cancer screening. Mammography can identify breast cancer in its earliest stages, when it is smaller and has not spread beyond the breast. In the search for a potential alternative to mammogram screening, researchers are studying other tests, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound, and more sophisticated 3D mammography (tomosynthesis).
Yet the mammogram remains the cornerstone of breast cancer early detection. Guidelines from the American Cancer Society (ACS) and other organizations recommend that these other imaging tests be used as an addition, not an alternative, to mammogram screening. “Mammography is the best screening tool for breast cancer that we have,” says Sharon Koehler, DO, a breast cancer specialist with the New York Institute of Technology.
Although effective, mammograms have some drawbacks. They might miss a cancer, and in some cases further testing may be needed to confirm whether or not a suspicious finding on a mammogram is cancer. The mammogram requires that a woman’s breast be compressed, which may cause some discomfort. And, the x-rays used in mammograms subject a woman to radiation.
“It’s a very small amount of radiation and hasn’t been proven to be harmful,” Dr. Koehler explains. “But I have patients who are afraid and don’t want any radiation. I have patients who just refuse mammography for that reason.”
Discover information on the diagnosis and treatment of various types of cancer. Also, learn about preventitive measures you can take to stop recurrence.
Claim your FREE copy, right now, of our definitive guide on cancer.
Alternative to Mammogram Testing?
Yes, a test like MRI or ultrasound can be used to detect breast cancer, but Dr. Koehler and other experts recommend each as a complement, not an alternative, to mammogram screening.
JUST GET SCREENED
Whether you’re at average risk of breast cancer and need only a standard mammogram or you’re a higher-risk patient who requires additional testing, what’s most important is to be screened, says Sharon Koehler, DO, a breast cancer specialist with the New York Institute of Technology.
“A lot of patients are afraid of what they might find out and don’t bother to go for screening because they don’t want to know,” she says. “I would encourage women not to be afraid, because the earlier a breast cancer is detected, the easier it is to treat and the more effectively we can treat it. It’s better to know than to not know.”
MRI and ultrasound have potential benefits and drawbacks. Unlike mammography, MRI and ultrasound use no radiation and do not compress the breast. On the downside, the MRI can be confining and may cause anxiety if you’re claustrophobic. Additionally, given its high sensitivity, MRI may detect noncancerous as well as cancerous spots in the breast.
“For the general population, MRI is probably not the best tool because there are a lot of false-positive results,” Dr. Koehler says. “It’s more likely to prompt the doctor to perform a biopsy, which may not be necessary.”
Most experts recommend MRI screening, in conjunction with mammography, only for women at higher risk of breast cancer, such as those with documented BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutations, women with a parent, sibling, or child who has a BRCA mutation and have not undergone genetic testing themselves, those who had radiation therapy to the chest between ages 10 and 30, and women with certain rare genetic syndromes.
MRI and ultrasound also may be used to further evaluate and characterize an inconclusive finding on a mammogram.
“Ultrasound also does not use any radiation, so some people who will not do mammography will agree to do an ultrasound,” Dr. Koehler explains. “But ultrasound is not a good breast cancer screening tool on its own. It has significant limitations. It’s operator-dependent, and even the best technician working slowly and carefully can still miss something that’s in the breast. It’s just the nature of the examination.”
Another test that may augment a mammogram is the clinical breast exam. The ACS does not recommend regular physical breast exams—performed either by a healthcare professional or by yourself—noting that research has not demonstrated that the exams provide a clear benefit for screening.
However, Dr. Koehler says, “I find the clinical breast exam, in many patients, to be very helpful. I personally have found things on my clinical exam that were not seen on imaging.”
She also encourages women to be vigilant about their breast health, understand how their breasts normally look and feel, and tell their physicians about any concerning changes.
A More Detailed Mammogram
When you have a mammogram, ask your doctor whether the test shows dense breast tissue—24 states have laws requiring that women be informed about breast density. Women with high breast density may be more likely to develop breast cancer. And, as breast density increases, spotting breast tumors on a mammogram becomes more challenging.
As a way to improve breast cancer detection, researchers are studying imaging modalities such as tomosynthesis. This technique not only provides the two-dimensional x-ray images of a conventional digital mammogram, but also combines them into an enhanced three-dimensional image of the breast.
Interim results of an ongoing study, published online March 9, 2016, in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, suggest that tomosynthesis and ultrasound may identify breast cancers initially missed on digital mammography in women with dense breast tissue. The researchers found that among 3,231 women with dense breasts whose initial mammogram results were negative, 24 additional breast cancers were detected on subsequent testing: 13 by tomosynthesis and 23 via ultrasound.
“We have found that ultrasound does better than tomosynthesis, but ultrasound is a separate test, it is time-consuming, and, in less experienced hands, it can lead to a lot of false alarms,” study author Nehmat Houssami, PhD, with the University of Sydney, Australia, said in a statement.
“However, tomosynthesis … can be carried out as part of the standard 2D mammogram screen or even instead of it. Given that tomosynthesis detected more than 50 percent of the additional breast cancers in these women, the implications are that it has the potential to be the primary mammography screening method without the need for an extra screening procedure.”